Use Case
Your product team’s memory, analyst, and writer — in one agent
Conduity connects to Linear, GitHub, Figma, Google Workspace, and your product docs. It tracks decisions, compiles research, drafts specs, and generates the status updates your stakeholders actually want to read.
The Challenge
The Problem
Product managers are information brokers. You sit at the intersection of engineering, design, sales, support, and leadership — synthesizing inputs from all of them into decisions, specs, and priorities.
- Stakeholder updates take an hour to compile because you’re pulling data from Linear, GitHub, Figma, and three Slack channels
- Decision tracking is scattered across meeting notes, Slack threads, and your own memory
- Sprint retros require manually tallying completed issues and writing a summary that nobody reads
- Customer feedback lives in support tickets, sales call notes, and NPS surveys — none connected to your backlog
- Specs and PRDs take half a day to write, and they’re outdated within a week
- Context for new team members takes weeks to transfer because it’s not documented
You’ve tried productivity tools, templates, and “just document everything” mandates. But documentation is a tax, and when things move fast, it’s the first thing dropped.
The Solution
How Conduity Changes the Workflow
Automatic decision tracking
When you discuss a decision in a conversation — “we’re going with annual billing for enterprise” — the agent extracts it and stores it in memory. No manual documentation needed. Weeks later, when someone asks why, the agent recalls the decision with the date and context.
Cross-tool intelligence
The agent has access to Linear, GitHub, Figma, and Google. When you ask “what’s the status of the auth redesign?”, it pulls the Linear issues, the Figma file, the merged PRs, and the recent design review notes — all in one answer.
Generated artifacts
Status updates, sprint summaries, PRDs, competitive analyses, stakeholder emails — the agent drafts them. You review, refine, and ship. The artifact is saved as a file, linked to the conversation, and searchable later.
Institutional memory
Your product knowledge compounds over time. Feature rationale, competitive positioning, customer feedback themes, technical constraints — it’s all in memory. When you write a PRD for v2, the agent already knows what was shipped in v1.
In Practice
A Week With Conduity
Monday — Sprint planning prep
PM
Prep me for sprint planning. What carried over from last sprint, what’s in the backlog ready to be picked up, and are there any blockers?
Agent
Sprint 14 Planning Prep
Carried over (3 issues):
- ENG-198: Settings page redesign — blocked on design
- ENG-201: Webhook retry improvements — 80% done, 2 more days
- ENG-205: API batch endpoint — not started, deprioritized mid-sprint
Ready in backlog (8 issues, 42 story points):
- ENG-210: BYOK key validation (8 pts) — spec ready
- ENG-211: Automation run history UI (5 pts) — designs approved
- ENG-212: Knowledge base Notion sync (8 pts) — requires Notion OAuth
- 5 more issues listed with points and status
Blockers to discuss:
- Settings redesign waiting on design — descope for this sprint?
- API rate limit from third-party provider — retry strategy needed?
Team capacity: Full team this week. No PTO. Maya has a conference Thursday (half day).
You walk into planning with everything compiled. The meeting takes 30 minutes instead of an hour.
Tuesday — Stakeholder update
Your VP asks for a status update on the Q1 roadmap:
PM
Write a stakeholder update for the Q1 roadmap. Cover what shipped, what’s in progress, and any risks.
Agent
Q1 Roadmap Update — Week of Feb 3
Shipped (3 of 8 roadmap items complete):
- Multi-channel deployment — launched Jan 22
- BYOK plan — launched Feb 1
- Automated issue triage — launched Jan 15
In progress (3 items):
- Knowledge base Notion sync — engineering starts this sprint, targeting Feb 21
- Settings redesign — blocked on design decision. Estimated 1-week delay.
- Mobile responsive dashboard — 60% complete, on track for Feb 14
Not started (2 items):
- SSO — scheduled for Sprint 16. On track.
- Public API v2 — scheduled for March. Spec in progress.
Risks:
- Settings redesign delay may push release to end of Feb
- Notion sync depends on Notion’s API rate limits
Five-minute review, forward to the VP. Done.
Wednesday — Customer feedback synthesis
PM
What customer feedback themes have come up in the last 2 weeks?
Agent
Customer Feedback Themes — Jan 20 to Feb 5
Theme 1: SSO (mentioned 8 times)
- 3 enterprise prospects blocked during sales calls
- 2 existing customers asked about timeline
- 3 Linear feature requests
Theme 2: Mobile experience (mentioned 5 times)
- 2 support tickets about dashboard rendering
- 2 Slack conversations about mobile being unusable
Theme 3: Automation templates (mentioned 4 times)
- Customers want pre-built recipes instead of writing prompts
Theme 4: Bulk knowledge upload (mentioned 3 times) Assessment: UX improvement, sprint-sized project.
Thursday — PRD first draft
PM
Draft a PRD for an automation templates feature. Users should browse pre-built recipes, preview what they do, and activate with one click.
Agent
PRD: Automation Templates
Problem: Users want automations but don’t know how to write effective prompts. 4 customer feedback instances in the last 2 weeks specifically mentioned wanting pre-built recipes.
Proposed Solution: A template gallery on the automation creation page. Users browse categories, preview templates, and activate with one click.
User Stories: 1. As a user, I can browse templates by category 2. As a user, I can preview a template’s trigger, prompt, and example output 3. As a user, I can activate a template with one click 4. As a user, I can edit pre-filled fields before saving 5. As an admin, I can create custom templates for my workspace
Success Metrics:
- 50% of new automations created from templates within 30 days
- Reduction in automation creation abandonment rate
The agent pulled from customer feedback, a past decision about agent selection from memory, and the existing automation architecture. A PRD that would take half a day is a solid first draft in 5 minutes.
Friday — Sprint retro data
PM
Compile sprint 13 retro data.
Agent
Sprint 13 Retrospective Data
Planned vs. Completed:
- Planned: 12 issues, 38 story points
- Completed: 10 issues, 34 story points (89%)
- Carried over: ENG-198 (settings, blocked on design), ENG-201 (webhooks, 80% done)
Velocity (last 4 sprints): Sprint 10: 30 planned, 28 completed (93%) Sprint 11: 35 planned, 31 completed (89%) Sprint 12: 32 planned, 32 completed (100%) Sprint 13: 38 planned, 34 completed (89%) Average: 34 planned, 31 completed (93%)
Persistent blockers:
- Settings redesign: blocked for 2 sprints. Design dependency is bottleneck.
- Third-party API rate limits: mentioned by Alex in 3 conversations.
Team sentiment:
- Maya: Positive about Vitest migration
- Alex: Frustrated about rate limit issue
- Sarah: Design backlog growing, requested dedicated design sprint
Features That Matter for PMs
| Feature | Why PMs Love It |
|---|---|
| Memory | Decisions, rationale, and context captured automatically |
| Knowledge Base | Upload product specs and competitive analysis. Agent references them when drafting. |
| Files | Every document is saved, versioned, and searchable. |
| Automations | Sprint summaries and stakeholder updates run on schedule. |
| Integrations | Linear + GitHub + Figma + Google = one agent that sees your entire workflow. |
| Channels | Deploy to Slack so engineers and designers can ask product questions. |
Ship the product, not the status updates
Connect Linear and GitHub in 5 minutes. Your first sprint summary is on the house.
Start Free Trial